Please Stop Voting To Hurt Other People


I get so tired of people waving national flags and bragging about how they live in Freedom. Because they don’t.

Freedom is the condition of every individual having complete control over his or her life and property.


– if somebody can successfully vote to have your money taken from you, you don’t live in a Free country

– if somebody can successfully vote to prevent you from marrying a person or several people simultaneously, you don’t live in a Free country

– if somebody can successfully vote to make you perform a job like soldier or sailor, you don’t live in a Free country

– if somebody can successfully vote to put you in a cage for smoking a plant, you don’t live in a Free country

– if somebody can successfully vote to make you pay for someone they have sympathy for – including themselves – you don’t live in a Free country

– if somebody can successfully vote to restrict your travel, you don’t live in a Free country

– if somebody can successfully vote to restrict anything that you and another consenting adult do, you don’t live in a Free country

– if somebody can successfully vote to keep you under unwanted surveillance , you don’t live in a Free country

– if somebody can successfully vote to make you accept a mandatory “service,” you don’t live in a Free country

If you live under a social system where other people can control your life and property by voting, you don’t live in a Free country. You don’t live in Freedom.

Democracy is not Freedom. Democracy is generally better than other coercive social systems – but it’s lightyears from satisfying a definition of true Freedom.

The first step in building something better than coercive Democracies is to stop waving flags and bragging about having Freedom that does not yet exist.

And for the love of all humanity –  please stop voting to hurt other people!

Read full story Comments { 0 }
Your Government At Work

Government Job Creation

Your Government At WorkIn their never-ending quest to garner enough votes to stay in power politicians have several time-proven tactics. One of these tactics is to promise that initiatives will “create new jobs” for the community.

This is how a pure government program works. They announce there will be a new $100 annual tax. However, that tax will generate 10,000 new jobs. The ‘jobs’ consist of 10,000 people employed to collect the $100 tax. That’s all they do, they create reports about the collections, they have meetings about it, they have an annual conference in Las Vegas to discuss ways other governments collect $100, they create formal reports concerning projections and trends on collecting the $100 and they otherwise keep themselves marginally busy with all manner of activity related to collecting the new $100 tax. All of the 10,000 new jobs involve collecting the $100 tax that pays for the creation of the jobs.

That’s a government job creation program in its purest form. So pure that if the politicians were to lay it out that plainly and honestly most people would not support it. (Some are so clueless they can’t see the problems even with the purest presentation. Marxist might fall into this category as well as many socialists.)

So the politician’s trick is to blend in some tangible benefit. Let’s say the new workers collect the $100 tax plus they monitor the price of coffee in your region to insure you don’t get ripped off by coffee sellers charging what they say is too much. This is basically what all government jobs amount to, a big expense with – perhaps – some small tangible benefit.

The Problems Are Obvious

1. If you saw an ad on TV for a company that charged you $100 per year to monitor coffee prices you would be very unlikely to become a customer. It’s just not worth it to most people, and if there were a demand, cheaper options would soon enter the market. In the case of the government program you have no choice – you pay for it or you go to prison for not paying the tax.

2. Assuming the new government jobs pay an average of $50,000 per year in wages and benefits, hundreds of millions of dollars get sucked out of people’s wallets to pay for virtually nothing of value. That money might have been invested in improving your education or health or for the benefit of one of your children or invested in productive new businesses, or just buying consumer products made by companies that employ productive people. Potential investment that causes financial growth is redirected into wastefully spent money.

3. After a couple of decades the 10,000 government workers start to retire with fat (unfunded) pensions and the taxpayers have to pay them to sit at home and not work. Taxpayers also have to pay for the replacement workers. So the $100 tax has to be increased to $180. This trend continues automatically and relentlessly.

4. Because the government creates a monopoly in the market of “coffee price watchdog” there is a single point of failure in that watchdog function. Coffee companies can find ways to corrupt the watchdog process. Eventually prices can rise with impunity because the solitary watchdog is more preoccupied with keeping the 10,000 jobs and retirements intact than with providing the marginal value originally promised.

5. Perhaps worst of all, 10,000 potentially productive, inventive, creative workers are seduced by easy money and unsustainable pension benefits into a lifetime of useless work that drags down the standard of living for all taxpayers and robs humanity of the positive contributions those people could have made in their lifetimes.

In the end the Government Job Creation program acts as a metastatic cancer on the standard of living and general welfare of everyone in the community. Every year the government workers want more money and benefits, some people in the community agitate to get similar jobs so they can get on the obvious gravy train of minimal work for big pay and they create pressure to further expand the program. Thus the cancer grows larger, draining more and more from the productive people in the community.

Every government program, department, office and function operates in exactly this way to lesser or greater degree. This arrangement can only exist in a coercive environment where people are forced to bear the expense in order to stay out of prison. In a truly Free society this situation can not exist. But we don’t live in a Free society, do we?

Read full story Comments { 0 }

Who Needs “Equality”?

This is a guest post about fairness and equality by Richard Paul Sprague, who lives in Hawaii and is a lifelong student of Freedom. Richard is happy to respond to comments below. If you would prefer his direct e-mail address to correspond just ask me. Copyright © 2014 Richard Paul Sprague. All rights reserved. The […]

Read full story Comments { 0 }

Passport To Freedom Conference

Well, it’s the Monday after the Nomad Capitalist conference, Passport to Freedom. It was a blast and one of the best things about attending was the ability to meet and network with so many people doing their part to move Freedom forward. Andrew Henderson and Matt DuBiel put together a superb conference and kept it […]

Read full story Comments { 0 }
Reserve your seat at Passport to Freedom

Building Personal Freedom

Do you consider yourself to be free? Are you more free today than you were ten years ago? Twenty years ago? Do you think our society is moving toward more individual freedom, or away from it? What I see is steadily increasing regulation of every individual’s activities and what he is ‘allowed’ to do with […]

Read full story Comments { 0 }

Do You Own Your Life?

I had an interesting conversation with a friend of mine in Canada. He was talking about downsizing everything in his life so he could have more time and money to do some of the things he’d prefer to do. What struck both of us was the proportion of a person’s expenses that are directly or […]

Read full story Comments { 6 }

What Really Matters to You?

In our culture we don’t spend much time thinking about happiness. It could be argued that happiness is the most important thing in life. It’s a universal good. Nobody has a personal definition for happiness that is a negative or something they want to avoid. Everyone wants happiness, however they define it. What is amazing […]

Read full story Comments { 5 }

TheVoluntaryLife Interview

Many thanks to Jake at TheVoluntaryLife blog and podcast for interviewing me about life as a permanent traveler. Jake is an excellent interviewer and in a short time we covered many topics including; Taking kids out of school Why travel is great for a family Encouraging kids to be individuals Living with coercive immigration rules […]

Read full story Comments { 2 }

Freedom App Interview At Freedom Lovin

Many thanks to Kevin over at Freedom Lovin‘ for interviewing me about The Freedom App and living with personal Freedom. Our discussion was eclectic and, I hope, very interesting. Kevin is another person encouraging people to build their own Freedom without waiting for some government to provide it to them. (Cuz’ that’s a looong wait.) […]

Read full story Comments { 0 }
Author, on Crete and thinking about personal Freedom and Ancient Greece.

How Can I Achieve Personal Freedom?

When you spend time talking to people about Freedom it becomes apparent that there are at least two perspectives among those who have a deep desire for it. Firstly, there is social Freedom that gets discussed (sometimes ad nauseum) by politicians, paid spokespeople and other manipulators of the populace. Their’s is the ‘freedom’ we will […]

Read full story Comments { 4 }

Interview With Nomad Capitalist

Andrew Henderson over at interviewed me for his radio and podcast program. We talk about living life as a permanent traveler, the contrast between countries where prospects are improving rather than diminishing, how weaker countries actually offer greater freedom because they have less ability to coerce and related issues. I hope our discussion stimulates […]

Read full story Comments { 2 }

Where Did Your Mother Go Into Labor?

As constant travelers my wife and I spend a disproportionate amount of time complying with immigration rules all over the world. She can visit Hong Kong for 90 days, I can stay for 180 days. I can vista Cuba, she cannot. I can stay in the US for 180 days, she can stay indefinitely. I […]

Read full story Comments { 0 }